Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santo Domingo, Nueva Ecija


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Speedy Keep  No argument for deletion advanced. The nominator may have intended to nominate Sto. Domingo, Nueva Ecija Philippines which has been redirected but that is neither clear nor in the scope of this AfD. Eluchil404 (talk) 07:03, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Santo Domingo, Nueva Ecija

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article already in Santo Domingo, Nueva Ecija. Bonvallite (talk) 03:30, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, I don't understand the rationale. Geschichte (talk) 19:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Neither do I. I think it has something to do with the merge request on the page, though. → Σ  τ  c . 22:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Reason #1, nomination does not advance an argument for deletion.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep why, pray tell, should we delete this? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.