Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santo Tabú


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e deckertalk 01:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Santo Tabú

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Overly promotional piece for non notable band (" confirming that the group is with down to earth, confident and constantly evolving"). Lacks coverage about them in independent reliable sources. Sourcing at time of nomination is the band talking about themselves, the abnds own bio, a listing for a show where they were support, a local review where they get a passing mention, the band talking about themselves, a review of a local show where the band supported, the band talking about themselves. A search found nothing better. Releases are not on important label. Radio play falls short of rotation. Much like other promotional and deceptively sourced articles by this editor a source title has been changed to make this band seem more significant. Source 4 is "Noche de música local para todos los gustos" not "Noche de música local para todos los gustos con Santo Tabú". Sources are also seemilngly thrown in at random, not always verifing claims made. (This page appears to be a rough translation of this copyright source.) duffbeerforme (talk) 12:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:49, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:49, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   15:11, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹   19:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.