Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santon (Transformers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 01:55, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Santon (Transformers)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Could not find any non-trivial coverage from reliable sources. Article is original research. Attempt to redirect was reverted. Beeblbrox (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC) Beeblbrox (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Only has 7 lines of text. Aronzak (talk) 07:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep It's an anime character with a small page and picture, and several references. A semi-obscure fictional character with an appropriate page. Mathewignash (talk) 09:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep There is some (small) notability. The references on the page show that. AlbinoFerret (talk) 20:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete All sources given are either fansites or directory listings, neither of which can't be used when determining notability. --Farix (Talk) 01:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This transformer appears in Beast Wars Second only. If this character appears in more series (japanese and american series), I vote Keep. But, I don't. I suggest merge into list of Beast Wars Second transformers. Zero Kitsune (talk) 04:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:FICT with no evidence of real-world notability, and no coverage from anything that could fairly be described as a reliable source. This is nonetheless better referenced than 90% of Transformers articles I've seen, but that just means there are a lot of them out there that ought to be deleted. Terraxos (talk) 04:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:FICT. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.