Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanwal Sajal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 17:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Sanwal Sajal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My searches simply found nothing to improve the sourcing, notability or simply overall improvement and this has existed since February 2007 with apparently closest links being two links added in the original. It's possible this exists but with all this detail and not even the slightest good source and no improvement since then, there's nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister  talk  17:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  17:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  17:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Have found this book source AusLondonder (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 02:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Delete Same as nominator. And that book is probably not a reliable source, seeing that its publisher is Books LLC. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 17:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Rainbow unicorn. Searches turned up nothing to show notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.