Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saptagiri express movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article in question has been made into a redirect, by Tokyogirl79. I can see no real reason as to relist again. (non-admin closure) Nordic   Nightfury  16:16, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Saptagiri express movie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NOTFILM. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: Meets WP:MOVIE and WP:GNG. Sources. Anup   [Talk]  03:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: There's a bit out there for it and at the very least I do think that it could redirect to a subsection of Thirudan Police, as this is a remake of that film. I'm going to fix the title on this to go to the correct capitalization. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I can agree for a merge/redirect but I'd want to know why it couldn't be a standalone piece. In addition to available sources, I believe it is reasonable to except some more sources after this film hits the theater. Doing a merge now, and in a month or so undoing that effort doesn't appeal to me. Anup   [Talk]  13:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I tend to be a bit conservative sometimes with unreleased movies unless there's a large amount of sourcing. This could probably pass, which is why I haven't decided one way or another yet - it's on the borderline for me. I want to see how others weigh in first, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's kept. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - has significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. Meets WP:NFSOURCES. Regards— UY Scuti Talk  14:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - As the great work by Tokyogirl79 demonstrates, it does pass WP:NOTFILM. Nominating an article of an Indian film article an hour after creation is not helpful, a form of WP:BITE and a possible case of WP:BIAS. --Oakshade (talk) 02:08, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.