Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara's Kitchen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 01:54, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Sara's Kitchen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Since creation in September 2012 by Darrank (who hasn't add anything else to the project), has been tag'd with multiple issues ever since. Looks much like an advert, I can't find anything either within the article or refs to substantiate WP:NOTABILITY. Going through AFD over PROD as it has existed for a reasonable period. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 03:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme   ( talk )  22:51, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; no signs of notability (Ideal Bride mentions, minor to begin with, seem to be selected from reader-submitted content: "If you would like your products to be considered for inclusion please look out for our facebook and twitter promotion or contact our editor"). squibix (talk)  02:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. I agree that the Ideal Bride mentions are problematic for notability.  In addition to the comments above, I'll note that those "Five Best" articles in Ideal Bride are so insubstantial that there is not actual narrative text and only a mention of a website. -- Whpq (talk) 17:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, definitely. Deb (talk) 14:16, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.