Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara & Kara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 17:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Sara & Kara
This is a page on minor characters from a cartoon called American Dragon: Jake Long. There already exists a page List of secondary characters in American Dragon: Jake Long, which should be sufficient per WP:FICT. Skittle 22:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I've not done this before. Should Brad Morton be considered at the same time, as it is also a copy/paste job from the List of secondary characters in American Dragon: Jake Long created by the same user? Skittle 22:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Per Help Desk, I have added the AfD template to Brad Morton, but linked it to this page. So consider this AfD for both articles please. Skittle 23:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Yes you should add them, as with most shows the minor characters should be on 1 page only. TJ Spyke 22:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Does that mean I should just mention it here, or create a seperate AfD for Brad Morton? I seem to remember something about not loading the boards with many similar cases.Skittle 23:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Two identical cases isn't bad. Thirty plus is. -- saberwyn 01:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete These disney characters are already detailed here. List of secondary characters in American Dragon: Jake Long scope_creep 23:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect back into the list article. If there is any new content, it can be added to the main character list, if not, people might search for the actual character, and a redirect would bring them to the actual list, where the relevant information would be incarcerated. -- saberwyn 01:40, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a load of Sugar. Drennleberrn 03:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.