Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Damergi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 19:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Sara Damergi

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non Notable Person. A virtual unknown presenter, on a minor channel The Dinkle 05:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Can not support AfD from new user, who should not be involved in or proposing AfD until experience is gained. Go contribute for a while then judge the work of others. --Kevin Murray 18:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonnotable like the other nominations by this user, who should be congratulated for his good work (and who would be wise to create a user page so that inconsiderate members of our community leave him alone henceforward). YechielMan 19:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Being direct is not being inconsiderate. You are way off-base encouraging this editor to continue with AfD after having virtually no experience as a contributor, and you are bordering on incivility by accusing me of being inconsiderate.  Looking at his prior AfD contributions, he has not yet developed an understanding of the guidelines.  No reflection at all on his ability or intentions; I wish him the best.  Cheers!  --Kevin Murray 22:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, Kevin - I understand where you're coming from, so no problem on my part with what you've said. It's a learning experience and all that, but there's articles like the ones I've nominated that I know don't honestly deserve a wikipage. The Dinkle 02:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing in the article appears to meet the criteria of WP:BIO. The only reason to keep appears to be an ad hominem attack on the nominator. Agent 86 20:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 86, protecting the procedures at AfD is not an ad hominem attack on the nominator. See above. --Kevin Murray 22:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, while agreeing that it is easier to accept nominations for AfD by seasoned editors in this case I must concur, no sources, no references therefore conflict with WP:V Alf photoman 01:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete:: While I concur with Kevin Murray about very new users doing AfD's that does not detract from the validity of the nomination. Maybe the new guy/gal just has a bit too much chutzpah.Veronica Mars fanatic 14:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Kevin Murray SriKorange — Mannfred5 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * keep But also noted that nominator has created an article about one presenter on The Great Big British Quiz and has now nominated all articles about other presenters on this channel for deletion.Hotmann 06:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - A presenter on a national Sky Digital show is notable. Per WP:BIO: "Notable actors and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions." The Great Big British Quiz is a very well-known show in Britain.  And, like Hotmann, I'm very troubled that the nom created an article on another Great Big British Quiz host and then nominating others for AfD.  --Oakshade 07:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Carryl Varley article was done mostly for her previous role as a british singer in the 90's. It's been through AfD, and kept strangely enough. The Dinkle 00:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * delete small time presenter on a small channel. Not really worthy. DannyDoodles 00:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This presenter appears notable, and I don't trust the motives of the nominator. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  00:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment How nice of you to make the accusation, but you'd be very wrong, along with other peoples attacking opinions here. :) The Dinkle 00:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.