Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Delamont


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 03:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Sara Delamont

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article lacks enough independent, reliable sources to establish notability. Two sources were written by the subject, and the other four are from her university, including her vita and a page of her specialties, which she wrote. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Fellow AcSS passes WP:PROF and big citations on Google scholar (32 publications with >100 citations each and h-index 53) also give her a pass of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as clearly above. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC).
 * Keep well-cited researcher. The article can be improved, but AfD isn't the way to go about that. — Stringy Acid (talk) 16:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep enormous citation record is conclusive. Agricola44 (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. is not given to all faculty, I assume. No Google Scholar profile, but GScholar shows top cites to articles and books by her as 954, 374, and a bunch more at 200-500 range (co-authored). Not seeing any sources about her, but she is likely at least borderline notable per WP:PROF. Couldn't find any reviews of the book, unfortunately. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  06:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.