Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Pedigo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Sara Pedigo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should be deleted as it is not notable under the WP:GNG. The article consists of only non-indepedendent sources or ones that trivially mention the subject. A WP:BEFORE search found sources such as is probably not WP:RS. This means the article should be deleted. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 20:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article does not meet the WP:GNG; and it is WP:TAINTED.Burning Pillar (talk) 00:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage and reliable sources found to verify the claims. Fails WP:N. --Elton-Rodrigues (talk) 21:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Of only local interest. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   23:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.