Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Althea Hill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sing! 00:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Sarah Althea Hill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is the equivalent of a BLP1E. Hill married a guy, and then spent the next twenty years fighting the courts to prove it. Scandalous? Maybe. Notable for anything else? No. Primefac (talk) 18:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  18:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  18:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep A book search reveals many sources including this, this, this, this and this. While I realise other stuff exists, I don't see much difference regarding the notability claim to, say, Christine Keeler and I don't think we can do anything about WP:BLP1E for someone who died in 1937. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:05, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: Looks like good sources to me, and several of them.  Nha Trang  Allons! 18:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Even if this person was notable for only one event, the event itself was notable per WP:EVENT. Antigng (talk) 09:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable to me, and well referenced.--00:33, 21 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dthomsen8 (talk • contribs)
 * Keep - "The case set legal precedent" - that's as clear as a claim to notability as they get. Our "biographies of living persons" policy obviously doesn't apply to a long dead person, but even if it did that would only mean the article should be renamed at most. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.