Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Baicker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Sarah Baicker

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable; not sure whether article can be properly fixed  Im per a t § r (Talk)  15:33, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Article was updated with additional information and references. Sarah Baicker is a feature editor with NBC universal, a blogger and published a book with WetFeet for women in business. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightmanjk (talk • contribs) 17:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no articles about the subject. The references provided in the artilce don't establish notability.  And in some cases, they don't even pass verifiability.  In particular, LinkedIn is not a reliable source. -- Whpq (talk) 20:16, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note that the article creator has removed much of the material. See this version in the history for the edition I was referring to. -- Whpq (talk) 12:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Nothing presented or apparent through google regarding subject to meet notability or wp:creative --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 03:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are a lack of reliable sources for establishing notability. --Megaboz (talk) 03:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The mabci and school sources don't mention the subject, linked in isn't reliable and the shop that lists the book doesn't even list the author's name. Serious lack of sources for verifiability (a small amount of sources doesn't immediately make something not notable, there's a whole list of other criteria we use for that). - Mgm|(talk) 09:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.