Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Bianchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 04:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Sarah Bianchi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG as a clear WP:PROMO piece. KidAd  talk  02:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - the only coverage close to being GNG coverage was the NYT article about her wedding; says it all Spiderone  16:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is ridiculous. She's an important political operative who was just added to the transition team after two decades of playing visible roles in Democratic presidential campaigns where she was the subject of coverage. She obviously should have a Wikipedia page. Lysander96 (talk) 17:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ^ Seems like WP:ILIKEIT. KidAd   talk  19:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete She is not an important political operative, she is a former low level government appointee. Nothing here suggests she is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:13, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Additional research and updates to the article appear to show WP:BASIC, including because "multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability." Beccaynr (talk) 14:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beccaynr (talk • contribs)
 * Comment Apologies for not signing my comment above, and thank you for the correction. To clarify, I think that with the New York Times profile of Bianchi early in her political career (separate from her wedding announcement), and the ongoing coverage and commentary about her political career in e.g. USAToday, The Hill, and The New York Times (separate from her wedding announcement), as well as coverage of her private sector career in Bloomberg News and CNBC, and the recent news reported by Politico about her leadership position in the Biden transition team, all of which either were or are now included in the article, there appears to be notability per WP:BASIC based on these multiple sources over time. There also seems to be notability in how Bianchi is not WP:LOWPROFILE, due to giving "one or more scheduled interviews to a notable publication" as an "expert." Beccaynr (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Since this deletion was opened, several significant sources have been added to the article and it has been extensively revised and enhanced. I reviewed these changes and I think it is clear the subject meets WP:GNG at this point. --Krelnik (talk) 18:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, gidonb (talk) 04:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep A case of WP:HEY. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 12:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.