Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Chambers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Sarah Chambers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No claim of significance per searches but passes CSD, as per prevous nom. Lacks independent in-depth, non-trivial support. red dogsix (talk) 01:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Draftify Obvious WP:COI and WP:NPOV ("the entity we know today as Michael") issues. WP:COIEDIT suggests passing through AfC process, so draftify, declare COI, and submit to AfC when ready. Bakazaka (talk) 02:35, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable sources and unlikely to get any.  All cited sources are by in-universe fantasy believers, and the article's text reflects this.  Who is likely to care enough to write reliable information about a crackpot who pretends to channel a spiritual hive mind through an ouija board?
 * A related article, The Michael Teachings, suffers from same problems, and has been tagged as lacking sources for ten years. 85.76.65.11 (talk) 07:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Basically a personal website on a non-notable person (with a high spam content), whose books aren't notable and whose ideas do not seem to have been picked up by reliable sources. Delete. Drmies (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Since the AfD nomination the article creator has made a hundred or so edits, including adding many sources that do not actually discuss the article subject. In current form the article is WP:COATRACK for The Michael Teachings. Bakazaka (talk) 20:47, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fringe subjects like psychics require high quality sourcing, which is lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:18, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks reliable sources needed to pass WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 11:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm not seeing anything reliable and noteworthy beyond the Santa Fe newspaper coverage, so she doesn't meet WP:GNG. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  19:04, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.