Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Chana Radcliffe (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:12, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Sarah Chana Radcliffe
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO. All the sources that I find are social media and publisher websites Rogermx (talk) 16:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete 20 years ago this article was kept, but that was back when we had much broader inclusion criteria. There are not enough reliable sources to justify this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:40, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete WorldCat shows that her books are held only in single or low (~25) double digits. Not notable as an author. Agricola44 (talk) 16:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.