Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Cornett-Ching


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Following Special:Diff/963828553. (non-admin closure)  NASCARfan0548  ↗  02:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Sarah Cornett-Ching

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominating in good faith. Lacks WP:IS and fails WP:NMOTORSPORT.  NASCARfan0548  ↗  22:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:11, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:11, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions.  NASCARfan0548   ↗  22:12, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that's probably a good idea. There's only two sources and she hasn't competed in stock cars since 2016. If other users can find more info and sources on her in the next few days that could save the article from deletion, they are welcome to, but if not, then I'd say it's OK to delete it. Cavanaughs (talk) 22:57, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Cavanaughs
 * Keep this should never have gotten to AfD. A simple WP:BEFORE Google search for "sarah cornett-ching", no keywords or filters, renders the following examples of independent, signficant coverage within the first five pages of search results:, , , (free account required), ,  and . Add in filters or addendums and you get more results. Easily passes GNG despite the fact that she doesn't meet WP:NMOTORSPORT. I implore both the nominator and page creator to look for sources before resigning to the undesirable fate of deletion.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 00:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.