Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Curran (historical)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. H e rmione1980 23:40, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Sarah Curran (historical)
Her only claim to notability is that "She was Robert Emmet's big love.", but Emmet's article doesn't mention her. If this is deleted, also delete redirect page Sarah Curran(Historical), and fake disambiguation page Sarah Curran. dbenbenn | talk 22:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Not sure what to do about this, but she's certainly well-known e.g. the pub up the road from me is named after her. I haven't got time right now to add to the article though.  Try a Google    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  22:35, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I wasn't familiar with this name before. But, with a little Googling it seems she is an historical name of note, even if by proxy.  Two centuries is a long time to be remembered.  Wikipedia should be a follower of who has been found to be notable, not a determiner of who should be deemed notable.   Also, while the Robert Emmet article doesn't mention her, it links to this, which does.   --rob 23:19, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Robert's letter to Sarah should make everything clear. Uncle G 03:42, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and move the article to Sarah Curran, as Sarah Curran(Pub) just redirects to the city the pub is in. The pub is mentioned in her article and probably doesn't need one of its own. -- Kjkolb 04:16, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the current contents of Sarah Curran (historical) but move to Sarah Curran. I've never seen a less necessary disambiguation page in my life. -R. fiend 05:06, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, undoubtedly, and move to Sarah Curran as per Kjkolb and R. fiend. Palmiro | Talk 13:04, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the comments above. Hall Monitor 18:09, 10 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.