Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Eberwein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   both speedy deleted at the request of the author (CSD G7). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Sarah Eberwein

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Also Steve Rothermel

I don't think that these people are sufficiently notable to have their own articles. It's all unsourced, and isn't really that "important". Also some serious COI issues, as the author claims that the subjects are themselves and their wife (see comment below). ╟─ Treasury Tag ► contribs ─╢ 14:39, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - You can delete us I added some sources from NBC and Tv.com. I wasnt aware that you needed to me a criteria to be included in this.  I had people asking why we didnt have our own pages so I figured I would make them for myself and my wife as we were on Tv in over 13 countries.  If you feel we need to be deleted fine. --Sleepernutz (talk) 15:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

There isn't really a COI issue when there is nothing being promoted Just delete the pages I'm fine with that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sleepernutz (talk • contribs) 15:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If you're happy for the pages to be deleted (and that would be very helpful!), please type db-g7 at the top of both articles, this will let admins know that you'd like them to be gone. Thanks! ╟─ Treasury Tag ► contribs ─╢ 15:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.