Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Faberge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Sarah Faberge

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

While she may be notable or, more specifically, a notable person, it isn't clear to me from the article, since it isn't established in the first place that a company's internal division for researching the company's background is notable at large or that, by extension, being one of that internal division's founding members makes one notable. I am particularly moved to have deletion considered because of the creation comment, "Entry reinserted at the request of Sarah Fabergé", which implies that this is a vanity piece rather than an objective article about a notable person. Wikipedia is not for self-promotion; it isn't a place to post your resume. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:59, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of notability, no evidence of third-party, non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. If the company is notable, and ancestors of this person are notable, that does not mean this person is automatically notable. The   Seeker 4   Talk  13:34, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 06:34, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- —Largo Plazo (talk) 01:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy per WP:A7. No assertion of notability, not to mention sources. Gosox5555 (talk) 02:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.