Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Fine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 23:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Sarah Fine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is at least one Sarah Fine who passes WP:NPROF, but it is not this one. Does not pass WP:GNG either.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete; as the article author, I agree. ‎⠀Trimton⠀‎‎  16:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Cambridge would not have hired her for nothing, and she's written some moderately well-cited (for philosophy) papers on the philosophy of immigration: "Freedom of association is not the answer" (Ethics 2010, cited by 117 on Google Scholar) and "The ethics of immigration: Self‐determination and the right to exclude" (Philosophy Compass, 2013, cited by 65). But that and an edited volume doesn't strike me as being enough for WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. So she may eventually become notable, but so far it is WP:TOOSOON. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, a case of TOOSOON, she currently fails WP:NPROF. --hroest 02:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per David Eppstein and per the author wanting the article deleted. Vaticidalprophet 07:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom, WP:TOOSOON, fails WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Absolutely zero reliable sources that demonstrate notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.