Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Frost


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. no deletion rationale in three weeks other then the nom JForget  14:19, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Sarah Frost

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:BIO, no substantial coverage in reliable sources just a couple of credit listings at IMDb and Yahoo! TV. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)


 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I should have checked, I used Twinkle. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 18:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I should have checked, I used Twinkle. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 18:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep As creator. Gage (talk) 05:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Might I suggest that you add some substantial coverage from reliable sources then? –– Jezhotwells (talk) 07:31, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * You might. In the meantime, while she does seem to be weak on WP:ARTIST, she had her hands in a number of notable shows.  If she were a voice actor rather than an "invisible" creator, she would pass WP:ENT, for example.  I would prefer to keep.  - BalthCat (talk) 07:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Having worked as a director on notable shows, she passes WP:ARTIST. -- L  P  talk 04:52, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.