Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Horick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Sarah Horick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Large amounts of passing mentions, but no significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Nothing found via Google News. Thus we have to conclude that Horick is not (yet) notable. The article was prodded for that reason, but all that was added were more passing mentions, plus a non-independent source. Huon (talk) 21:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

The nature of the work is the reason that the subject is covered in what has been deemed "passing mentions." The subject is typically included in programs or events with multiple artists, and therefore discussions of the subject/subject's work are in the context of a collection of other artists as well. 5 October 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redweagle (talk • contribs) 21:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now and draft and userfy if needed as although News, browser and Highbeam found some links, there's not much for better sourcing. SwisterTwister   talk  05:39, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 22:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - searches turned up not enough in-depth independent coverage to meet notability criteria.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 02:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.