Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Hudson-Pierce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Sarah Hudson-Pierce

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Concerned about notability here. The article was PRODed and then REFUNDed years ago but it seems obvious to me that both the creator - the WP:SPA - and a major contributor -  - are the same person and, indeed, the article subject. The latter account was blocked for promo. I've just had to clean up a lot of that at various articles, obviously inserted by another promo account.

I do not have access to most US newspapers but this lady runs a small self-publishing/print on demand service and has written what appear to be a few non-notable books. She's also dabbled in journalism at relatively minor newspapers, allegedly with one piece of writing of note. Perhaps her TV show makes her notable but the entire thing stinks of publicity-seeking, by design or misunderstanding. Sitush (talk) 06:59, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

BTW, I ripped a lot out of this article today prior to nominating here. Before commenting, people might like to check the history. - Sitush (talk) 07:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete She is a columnist for The Times of Shreveport in Louisiana (she shows up on Newspapers.com), and has written for Guidepost, etc. However, I don't see any reviews of her work in the databases I have access to, so the only review we have is from Guideposts on one work, and I'd need to see more to believe she passes CREATIVE. There are no bios that are independent of her either. If anyone finds sources I haven't, feel free to ping me to re-evaluate. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per Megalibrarygirl.  Montanabw (talk) 05:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete In 2015 I PROD this article because it was clearly self-published, and at that time the subject was not notable. Very little of the article has really changed since then, except for a brief dusting off by the sock-puppets that were finally banned. I still firmly believe that this page should be deleted. Zeugzeug (talk) 01:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.