Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Kliff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 21:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Sarah Kliff

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, no independent coverage, a perfectly sound journalistic career but no notability per WP:JOURNALIST. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - I found a 2018 CJR interview with some WP:SECONDARY context, and a 2019 NPR interview with less, but this does not appear sufficient for WP:JOURNALIST or WP:BASIC notability. Her website says "Her reporting has inspired new legislation in Congress, been cited by the Supreme Court, and resulted in multiple hospitals revising their billing policies," and CJR reports, "Since Kliff started the project, lawmakers have introduced multiple bills to address surprise medical fees, including legislation sponsored by New Hampshire democratic Senator Maggie Hassan that aides told CJR is inspired by Kliff’s reporting." Despite her established career as a journalist, it appears to be WP:TOOSOON to meet the notability guidelines. Beccaynr (talk) 04:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete She has no coverage in independent sources, nor does it investigate any high-profile cases.--Wellring (talk) 13:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * comment out of process, no notification.--Aesopstael (talk) 20:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.