Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Laurene Jackson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  00:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Sarah Laurene Jackson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A non-notable model and actress. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 02:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, this should have been WP:CSD, meets A7. Message from XENUcomplaints? leave me a message!  03:08, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, acting credits include a redlinked indie film, and handing out giant cheques on "Deal or No Deal". Not enough to meet WP:ENTERTAINER, I'm afraid.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:51, 28 November 2008 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * There was no consensus? Let me chime in: Delete. Entirely non-notable, as of yet of course. Drmies (talk) 03:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete An article only a sentence long. get rid of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstanton (talk • contribs)
 * That is called a WP:STUB and not a valid reason for deletion. - Mgm|(talk) 09:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment No one besides one single person has yet explain why they consider this person non-notable. Before any sort of consensus is determined, we need well-reasoned !votes that explain lines of reasoning. - Mgm|(talk) 09:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:ENTERTAINER, has not had significant roles on multiple notable films etc. Tassedethe (talk) 10:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. By WP:BIO only source in article that discusses her at any length is the canoe.ca website link, which isn't enough to indicate notability, IMO. I've not been able to find any further sources. I've checked all the results of a google search for "Sarah Laurene Jackson", which didn't turn up any reliable sources, and similarly '"Sarah Jackson" canadian model' on Google news. If other sources can be found, I'll re-consider my !vote. I don't think she passes WP:ENTERTAINER either, based on her minor role on Deal or No Deal, or her single film role. Silverfish (talk) 00:27, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.