Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Sarah Law

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG Previously deleted Articuno appears (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Articuno appears (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: the previously "WP:A7-d" article (in 2016) was about a different person of a similar name. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - there are articles about her in Scrum Magazine but I can't access them. They may well have significant coverage. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:36, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Does fail WP:NRU but there is a lot of coverage, and I imagine some of the coverage in Scrum Magazine would constitute SIGCOV as they tend to do more than just match reports and announcements. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 11:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Has some coverage to qualify for GNG. Purosinaloense T/K 12:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment recent article (if it is the same person) compares her to a chess player in control of her team Kaybeesquared (talk) 15:45, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - the coverage in Scotsman and Six Nations Rugby is just about enough for WP:GNG in my opinion. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:59, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - enough coverage to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:23, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - I would agree with the argument that she has received enough coverage to meet general notability requirements. Dunarc (talk) 22:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.