Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Lawrence College campus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Sarah Lawrence College. NW ( Talk ) 00:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Sarah Lawrence College campus

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable; there is nothing significant about the architecture, nothing notable seems to have happened here. Seems to be NOTADVERTISING for the school. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Note: This article did not have an AfD template and was not listed at AfD. I have added the template and listed it under 16 September. --Orlady (talk) 01:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC) "Merge. Honestly, we can't have separate articles on college campuses, even ones as pretty as this one. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 00:11, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Sarah Lawrence College. tedder (talk) 14:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge. It is entirely normal to cover the campuses of university or colleges. It is an editorial decision as to whether to include the information in the main page or a subsidiary article. Sources are available on a number of the buildings and there is no evidence that the nominator has searched for them per WP:BEFORE. I agree that the page needs a thorough-going clean to remove promotional content but that, again, is an editorial matter. Better to follow the procedure in WP:MM I suggest. TerriersFan (talk) 18:52, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Sarah Lawrence College. I have been involved with this article in the past and I am aware of numerous long-standing issues with unsourced and promotional content. I've looked for sources in the past, without much success. The topic can be handled effectively in the main article for the college, absent the unsourced trivial details. --Orlady (talk) 01:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.