Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Macmillan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. The subject is mentioned in the articles on the Macmillans. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Sarah Macmillan

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't think being the potentially illegitimate daughter of nobility passes WP:BIO. A google search returns primarily others with the same name. Travellingcari (talk) 21:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC) Travellingcari (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. "That person A has a relationship with well-known person B is not a reason for a standalone article on A". Kakofonous (talk) 00:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Kakofonous Achromatic (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Moving comment from Talk: This item should be retained. There is a wider interest for the 1960s with the fickleness of Lady McMillan and Lord Boothby's friendship with the Kray twins. It is a fascinating era and all strands should be maintained 86.160.170.208 (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.