Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Marince


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Sarah Marince

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person is a completely minor musical figure, who has accomplished nothing to merit a wikipedia page. Xapxapxap (talk) 00:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 February 8.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 01:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete The billboard links did not pan out. The coverage on the page does not amount to significance meeting the GNG. No evidence of meeting WP:MUSIC (I was hoping she charted on BillBoard). AllMusic, BillBoard, and RollingStone did not show notability. Dloh  cierekim  01:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Switch to keep based on billboard and thanks to Dissolve for finding the billboard. The coverage I had already seen, and it is NOT sufficient for the GNG. The billboard does the job for me though. Dloh cierekim  04:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep A quick google search turns up multiple reliable secondary sources that meet WP:GNG: CBS Pittsburgh, M Magazine, Pittsburgh Magazine, and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Also meets WP:MUSICBIO #2 - Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart: her single "In the Meantime" reached No. 60. on Billboards country songs chart. dissolve  talk  04:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. The chart placement by itself is not the clincher but, combined with the coverage above and other sources like this, there appears to be enough on the whole to warrant inclusion.  Gong   show  20:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.