Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Oppenheimer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) '''-- [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riley_Huntley/You_missed! Cheers, ] Ri l ey   ''' 00:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Sarah Oppenheimer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

DePRODed by creator without  addressing  the issues. Concern was: ''Only primary sources. A list of exhibitions does not assert notability - all artists exhibit. Fails criteria at WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE''. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:54, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 *  Userfy  The article looks fishy - quickly-created promotional article, by a brand new SPA  who obviously already knew how to do Wikipedia articles.  Actually they quickly created a whole set of  crosslinked articles; see DUVE Berlin (also just created by the same SPA)  and the list of artists (with even less sourcing than this one) in that article.  But it's only one day old. Existence of wp:notability-suitable sources looks possible, if not likely.   There should be a chance to see if wp:suitable sources can be added  and brought back into article space then. North8000 (talk) 12:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Change / update based on subsequent work by Colapeninsula. North8000 (talk) 20:24, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep A quick Google shows coverage in New York Times and Wall Street Journal as well as other briefer mentions in the NYT, Art Review, Artforum, etc, some of which I've added to the article. This article needs work, but she's a notable artist. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:07, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm just  pointing out here that  the article about the  DUVE Berlin gallery  has just  been deleted for the second time. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:25, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:25, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:25, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:29, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep but needs more clean-up. Bearian (talk) 19:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.