Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah W. Brannon

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was agree with speedy. humblefool&reg;Deletion Reform 19:34, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Sarah_W._Brannon
actually, Sarah Weatherly Brannon did not win the Nobel Prize at 29. (Fake article) 128.112.24.137 03:49, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. An astrophysicist winning the Nobel Prize for medicine would be interesting cross-pollination but it is an obvious hoax. Capitalistroadster 06:17, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete It talks about a speech in December 2005...obviously it's hard to take any of this seriously. Can it be speedied? --  Etacar11   16:58, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I see no reasons why it shouldn't be a sure candidate for speedy delete because of patent nonsense, but I am not absolutely sure. If I am making a mistake in adding the db, would a more experienced Wikipedian please tell me? --DrTorstenHenning 17:50, 5 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.