Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Weishuhn (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 22:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Sarah Weishuhn
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The sources are no where near enough to pass GNG. Winning a US state beauty pageant is not in and of itself enough to make someone notable. In this case that is literally all we know about Weishuhn. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete presuming that winning a state-level pageant of a major national pageant is not inherently notable. I agree that appears to be all we have here.   Montanabw (talk)  02:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  03:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG with Montanabw's caveat of "presuming that winning a state-level pageant of a major national pageant is not inherently notable.". I think we need the WP:NPAGEANT policy that others have suggested. Chickadee46 (talk&#124;contribs) (WP:MCW) 00:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * DELETE concur with nom. Winning one state level pageant does not establish notability.  MB  03:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete At the moment this is a BLP1E and there is no other claim of notability other than the state pageant winner. It fails GNG and winning a state pageant is not enough to confer notability. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.