Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah higgs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy deleted by CJLL Wright per CSD A7. BryanG(talk) 06:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Sarah higgs

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Should have been speedied as a non-notable bio but someone claims that she "might" be notable. -- RHaworth 20:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy delete Changed my mind. I have a bad head today and I obviously haven't relised what I was doing. The article is infact a Blatant advertisement for their own website plus the chance and pride of having their own article on wikipedia. delete. Retiono Virginian 20:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - a typical example of when to use . Walton monarchist89 20:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: Predicted film star, indeed.  . V .  [Talk 20:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, does not assert notability. GregorB 20:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as advertisement. Tagged as such. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 20:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - completely non-notable. Turgidson 00:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete db-bio. JuJube 01:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Tagged for speedy delete. SkierRMH 02:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.