Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarangapani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  21:56, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Sarangapani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: as non-notable individual. Unreliable self-published reflink sources. Fails GNG. Quis separabit? 19:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article's current state is grim, but this isn't cleanup. A focused Google Books search returns snippet views of quite a few seemingly reliable sources--including at least a couple scholarly journals on the topic of Indian musicology--that seem (based on the available excerpts) to regard Sarangapani as historically influential. The article would very much benefit from someone with experience in the field and access to the appropriate sources, but I think this is more an example of the difficulties in sourcing pre-Internet topics from certain parts of the world (such as, here, India), rather than a lack of notability. Unfortunately, I don't think I can arrange access to the requisite works in anything like short order. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 20:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 10:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 10:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 10:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. I will add valid sources, but need time. He is closely related to Venugopalaswamy Temple, Karvetinagaram and there is valid article source regarding Sarangapani in this article. He is one of the famous medieval poets of Padam tradition in Telugu. aggi007(talk) 12:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Of course, he is notable. See, e.g., (pp. 448-449), . --Tamtam90 (talk) 23:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.