Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarasota Military Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) – TheGridExe  ( talk )  19:30, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Sarasota Military Academy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article was PROD in 2007 and recreated in 2014 while still not addressing WP:GNG concerns. I'm unable to speedy delete this article (created by banned user at the time) as it's been improved since its recreation in 2014. – TheGridExe  ( talk )  14:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. –  TheGridExe  ( talk )  14:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. –  TheGridExe  ( talk )  14:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I also wouldn't be against a redirect to Sarasota County, Florida. – TheGridExe  ( talk )  16:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is a public high school with more than 1000 students. Regular news and sports coverage is apparent in basic searches, with examples such as . The school is notable under Wikipedia's currently prevailing standards applicable to such schools. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Is there a specific guideline for schools? I keep on finding the older discussions but nothing explicitly stated. Also, would the matter of it being a charter school change things? I see that they operate separately from the county's School Board but there's still involvement with the county. – TheGridExe  ( talk )  12:41, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Accredited secondary school with plenty of coverage. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. There has been some nonsense claiming that a couple closers of a bad RFC are allowed to gag all others from mentioning wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.  wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. --Doncram (talk) 14:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Accredited secondary school with plenty of coverage. Per long-standing precedent as documented at OUTCOMES. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Some of the articles posted by  can be used towards significant coverage, namely the ones about expanding the campus, changing leadership, so there is potential beyond a single sentence about the school.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I wish to withdraw my nomination per above. Thank you for the input, everyone. – TheGridExe  ( talk )  19:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.