Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarcobatus Flat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Krakatoa Katie  07:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Sarcobatus Flat

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

One of over 200,000 USGS HUCs that are not all notable. Major watersheds and the like can be notable but the little features that are not well know do not need an article. This one simply does not meet the notability guidelines. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral Unlike some of the similar articles, this one could be rewritten to be about the physical feature rather than the HUC, I'm not sure whether there's much to say about it though. Kmusser (talk) 18:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Per Notability (geography). Just needs some care and cleanup --Mike Cline (talk) 12:18, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia traditionally covers sourced, large geographical features.  Sandstein   06:49, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.