Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sardar Mahadik family Gwalior


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Sardar Mahadik family Gwalior

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This seems to be a personal genealogy project attempting to be a Wikipedia article. The family don't appear to meet the notability guidelines. Rotten regard      Softnow  21:04, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:01, 11 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a notable lineage at all. Buggie111 (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is, as the nominator notes, just someone's family history project (complete with family snaps!). I've tried contacting the creator of the article but they have not responded. Morwen (Talk) 11:21, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: Perhaps the first half of the article deserves a closer look—the members of the family described in the second half certainly aren't notable, neither individually nor collectively, but I am not sure that the same can be said about the first (older) half. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratzd...] 05:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Some of the family members are undoubtedly notable.  In those cases the material can be inserted in their individual articles when created.  However, their is precious little establishing notability of them as a family.  They seem to have been senior figures in government, but not a royal line themselves.  All the references are either not RS or are shortish descriptions of individuals in biographies etc of more notable persons.  That is not enough in RS to have a family article from what I can see.  Spinning  Spark  15:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.