Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sardar Meer Dilmurad Khan Khoso


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (NAC).  American Eagle  ( talk ) 20:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Sardar Meer Dilmurad Khan Khoso

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any third-party refs. Ironholds (talk) 23:56, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think the nominator's searches were hindered by the South Asian habit of adding multiple honorifics to names. The common spelling for the subject's name seems to be "Dil Murad Khan". This Google Books search confirms that he was a notable leader. I've done what I can to add sources to the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Keep:

I believe the story is based on history and have a contact with the family, so will suggest they document more fully. Please keep. Also deals with long ago history so zero risk of distorting or hurting reputation of living people, organizations or national interests. BJMorrow —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.149.36.186 (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Well done, Phil. I'm not convinced he was that important a figure, as all he is noted for is a failed rebellion, but OK. Fences and windows (talk) 01:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Having his glasses crushed and going with uncorrected vision did not make him go blind. That is a myth. Also the article needs to be moved to the proper title if it is kept. Drawn Some (talk) 06:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks like there are real sources that back up that he was real historical figure. Next step will be to make sure that the article matches the verifiable facts, but this has the potential to become a decent article. Avram (talk) 06:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Being in a real world encyclopedia qualifies as notable enough to me. Grandmartin11 (talk) 15:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.