Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarkari Naukri In India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Sarkari Naukri In India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prod that was removed by a IP-a article that comes across as more of a advertisement I believe. Wgolf (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom and WP:OR. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - an ill-conceived article with no sources. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete This is bad, shit article and not suited for wikipedia. -- Haccom    &#9993; Talk to me   07:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Very bad article, the only reference is in the reference section, not tied to anything. AlbinoFerret  23:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete The article is very poorly written and sources as well. Should be deleted immediately. Dormantos (talk) 12:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This newly registered account has left the very similar deletion rationales (almost every one a "strong delete") on dozens of AfDs in rapid fashion. Likely he did not read any of the articles (one he said fails "BLP" was a company, for example). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:OR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above/OR. At best this would be a WP:TNT situation. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 16:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete - WP:BLOWITUP and start again, Clearly WP:OR. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be WP:OR.  Kharkiv07 Talk  20:08, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.