Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarsai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as this is likely the consensus and not to mention geographic locations are almost always kept. (NAC) SwisterTwister   talk  04:58, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Sarsai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very small article a village in india that may not meet notability  Bobherry Userspace  Talk to me!   Stuff I have done  15:14, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND which states in part: "Populated, legally recognized places are typically considered notable, even if their population is very low." My only concern with this article is its lack of citations but a cursory check does in fact verify that it's a real place. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   15:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — ☮  JAaron95  Talk   15:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Looks like a real town to me. Population centers are notable regardless of size.--Oakshade (talk) 19:06, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Settlements are notable regardless of size. The Census of India search engine appears to be broken but an unofficial mirror says this place had 5,162 persons in 2011. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND and I strongly suggest the nom to familiarize himself or herself with policy prior to any further nominations of notable places. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 02:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.