Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarv Webs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 05:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Sarv Webs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Two or three reliable articles attest its involvement in a notable(???) scandal, but it doesn't appear to be notable on its own; not all the sources on the election/the scandal even mention Sarv. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 14:50, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:17, 28 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Totally not notable. Especially considering the company isn't even mentioned in some of the citations. It appears to me that the "scandal" was just inserted in there as a way to make an article that's clearly an advert seem like it's for a notable subject when it isn't. Total, scam. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:45, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - run of the mill digital marketing company for politicians. Notwithstanding the "controversies" section, this is classic spam. In 2020, everybody knows we are a charity, not a web-host. Bearian (talk) 13:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete For reasons stated. Dorama285 (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP. KartikeyaS  (talk) 17:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nothing here (description of company registration, minor trade awards and a role in political campaigning) is indicative of more than a firm going about its business; no evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 18:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.