Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasha Knox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to My Bare Lady. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 01:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Sasha Knox

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO This article was nominated for a WP:CSD which was contested with a "maybe it meets a criteria." Brought to the full community for WP:CONSENSUS.--moreno oso (talk) 03:59, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It wasn't by any stretch of the imagination eligible for an A7. Seriously two minutes after [] goes up, and you've speedied the only article I'm listed on my userpage as creating. Then you AfD it within three minutes of another editor removing the speedy nom? Next time you get the urge to make a bad faith nomination in retribution for an AfD, you might want to check the edit history of the article you're nominating. Horrorshowj (talk) 05:08, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Please observe proper AfD rules and do not conduct personal attacks. I am Page Patroller and have many more edits tonight in combatting vandalism. To name a few, I had a page protected; I opened a WP:SPI and had a couple of other articles WP:CSD'ed. My contribs will prove those edits. moreno oso (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * So the timing is just an enormous coincidence then. Out of curiosity to you frequently misapply A7 tags to articles that assert notability, well even if the weren't already ineligible by virtue of surviving a higher deletion proceeding, or is that also coincidence?Horrorshowj (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable sources, no assertion of notability, and really no information on the person. Borock (talk) 05:05, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - This does seem like a pointy nomination in reaction to the Rachel Starr afd. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The vandal blocked by the SPI would say the same. Let's move on with the debate and stop the NPA attacks. moreno oso (talk) 12:35, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't understand what you are referring to with regards to the SPI vandal and how it relates to your nomination of this article unless you are making an ad hominem argument. Commenting on the possible motive of a nomination with the given evidence is not a personal attack. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Appears to fail GNG & PORNBIO as the nominator states. DiiCinta (talk) 12:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to My Bare Lady - Her notability is mostly based on being one of the four stars of the first season of that show. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * While the nominator's motive certainly appears retaliatory, the subject looks to clearly fail the pertinent notability guidelines; therefore Delete. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:25, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to My Bare Lady per Morbidthoughts. No longer passes WP:PORNBIO due to the increase in award requirements, as noted in my previous PROD listing.Horrorshowj (talk) 13:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.