Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasha Unisex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:BASIC, WP:ARTIST j⚛e deckertalk 14:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Sasha Unisex

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Russian tattoo artist. Fails to establish notability - trivial third-party coverage. (Sourced to her own profile, a very brief page at Inked magazine and two "top N" lists at Buzzfeed.) Repeatedly created article, contested proposed deletion. Delete and protect. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Notability should be easily established by the articles that are highly viewed about her and her art. Many people on Wikipedia are less notable. Sasha has over five hundred thousand followers on Instagram, even though that cannot be cited. The deletions are not correct and so I will continue to create this. Most Wikipedia pages aren't created by second party sources and almost none are first party sources. - PickleG13 (talk) 7:54, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * See the notability guidelines, in particular the guidelines for biographies. When I talk about third-party coverage, I mean coverage which is independent from both the artist herself and Wikipedia. The coverage currently in the article indeed looks trivial, and the sources I have discovered in a brief Google search aren't much better. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to fail WP:ARTIST; the coverage is weak. Being mentioned on the 'net is not good enough. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails NARTIST specifically - and GNG. Flat Out (talk) 22:47, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.