Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SaskTel International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to SaskTel. Courcelles (talk) 00:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

SaskTel International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I was actually going to redirect this to SaskTel but as it's fully mentioned there or is there something to support a move there, I'm not sure if deleting is a better option. My searches found here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister  talk  18:37, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:04, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete As promotion. The advertising language and content cannot be easily cleaned-up in this case, because it's integrated throughout. Any notability they do have is marginal enough to make cleanup, research and re-writing not a worthwhile endeavor. CorporateM (Talk) 19:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge I think the reliably sourced statements in this article (about 4 or 5 lines) could be merged into SaskTel under its own section with the title SaskTel International. Curiocurio 22:35, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   03:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   09:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge sourced material to SaskTel and then Redirect. No reason this should have its own article independent of the article on the parent company, whose page isn't long enough to merit a split. Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.