Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sastrakeralam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad.  MBisanz  talk 00:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Sastrakeralam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability for 5 years; I couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk) 13:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete: out of 33,400,000 people of Kerala, only 10000 copied of this magazine gets sold. Though it exists, as per info on primary website http://www.kssp.in/content/publications, but almost no news coverage on it. Seems to be an advertisement.--GDibyendu (talk) 15:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Could the nominator and/or the "strong delete" proponent please explain what is wrong with the sources found by the Google Books and Scholar searches linked by the nomination procedure? Phil Bridger (talk) 19:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * There is already an article on Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad. Sastrakeralam is not notable enough on its own, to have a separate article on it, does not have sufficient coverage. WP:PAGEDECIDE.--GDibyendu (talk) 05:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, no one seems to be caring much about this AfD. A publication with a circulation of 10,000 copies could well be notable, that's really not dispositive.  The fact that it appears to be a high school educational publication is less promising.  There's no reason we couldn't redirect to the publisher, Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad.--Milowent • hasspoken  14:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad per Milowent. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.