Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasural Ke Rang Anokhay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Angeline Malik. Star  Mississippi  15:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Sasural Ke Rang Anokhay

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 15:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 09:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 15:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Angeline_Malik: creator+director - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  13:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Passes WP:TVSeries, broadcasted in Pakistan on Hum TV as Sasural Ke Rang Anokhay and in India on Zee Zindagi as Yeh Sasuraal Bemisaal. A series broadcasted in 2012 is likely notable as most of the Pakistani newspapers remove that much old coverage. Libraa2019 (talk) 17:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Libraa2019, Please avoid WP:ATA and provide coverage that you believe is sufficient to meet GNG. Also - WP:TVSeries is an essay, not even a guideline. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 18:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Its not necessary to reply every comment & editor who oppose your views. The history at mutiple AFD's indicates that i provide sources and you reject them so please leave some things to others. Libraa2019 (talk) 18:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Libraa2019, You've consistently voted to keep based on ROTM coverage, Trivial mention as well as unreliable sources, so it's crucial to counter your argument. And just because an AFD closed in your favor doesn't mean my nomination wasn't legit. Don't forget, several of my AFDs were closed as deleted despite having keep votes, including yours.So let's set that aside and focus on discussing this AFD. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 18:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * No i only voted to Keep which are initiated by you as you copy pasted the same rationale for almost dozens of nomination. Right now, many AFD's are live  but i have not voted Keep because other editors do research before initiated AFD's but i am doubting such research is done at your side or not. Libraa2019 (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.