Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satan's Mother


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  22:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Satan's Mother
Definition; no sources for over half a year; inappropriate. Might want to jump over and delete the French article as well. Found as random article. Additionally, Little Satan follows same logic. SeizureDog 12:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both per nom. --Coredesat 12:37, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. RicDod 13:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another in an endless stream of definitions/neologisms.--Fuhghettaboutit 13:59, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Satan's Mother as A1 - no context. Delete Little Satan as there are plenty of g-hits, but no single definition.  Some hits are in reference to a disobedient kid as a "little satan".  Some are in reference to a particular ally of the US (whereas the US is the Great Satan).  As one user pointed out in another AFD - and this would make a great essay - if ten people have stupid uncles that they refer to as "my stupid uncle", that doesn't mean that the phrase "my stupid uncle" deserves to have a Wikipedia article. BigDT 16:48, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Little Satan now has its own AFD at Articles for deletion/Little Satan. Because there are separate issues to consider for the two and because Little Satan was not originally tagged with afd1, I felt it would be appropriate to split them.BigDT 16:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The author might add this one line bit of info to the article on Great Satan as the latter does meet notability criteria. Interlingua 20:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary (which is giving this term the benefit of the doubt, even so). Ted 23:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep These are important terms used in political discussions. --TrevorMay 04:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, no context. --CharlotteWebb 14:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.