Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sathiyam TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Sathiyam TV

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: as non-notable subject; article is mostly promo/advertising. Quis separabit? 19:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - pure SPAM; fyi earlier version was deleted Sathiyam tv —Мандичка YO 😜 20:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete or move to List_of_Tamil-language_television_channels as this channel exists and has gotten some but not enough attention as shown here along with passing mentions here and here (this last one for image attribution). Considering Sathiyam tv was started in June 2013 and this current article was started shortly after, further creation with no significant improvement may require page protection and I'll add this to my watchlist. SwisterTwister   talk  20:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, the channel has received coverage for its shows, warning given by Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and for a teacher abusing a Congress MLA during one of its shows.--Skr15081997 (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 03:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Advertising/spam. There are undoubtedly controversies, as there would be with any Tamil language broadcaster. That should be discussed elsewhere, though. This particular "tv" having its own article, filled with links and promos, is intolerable, as that will remain in the history, and someone will always be motivated to revert back (since someone was motivated to create it, twice). Yes, current controversies with private media should get coverage, but not by granting each one a platform for advertising. Hithladaeus (talk) 14:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.