Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satish Pande


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus was that the subject meets WP:NPROF (presumably C1 and C7) and even WP:GNG.

Suggestion: Try using WP:BASIC, which is less strict than WP:GNG on wp:significant coverage while still making the subject presumably notable. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 11:35, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Satish Pande

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non notable environment actvist. None of the sources are giving WP:SIGCOV about the subject. Did a WP:Before and could not find anything Kichu🐘 Discuss 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 <i style="color:blue">Discuss</i> 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Arguably also meets some PROF criteria (he has some well cited publications), but readily meets GNG due to his impact on avian conservation in India. The Hindustan Times labels him as an eminent ornithologist, he is profiled by Times of India, and has been inducted into the World Owl Hall of Fame (also Times of India). There is quite a bit of coverage out there.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 09:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  EN  - Jungwon  06:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 05:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Eostrix's argument above. Enough to pass GNG based on the provided sources. Kolma8 (talk) 12:53, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Eostrix. Notable enough for having a standalone page. The notability tag on the article was placed unscrupulously if not wrongly. Chiro725 (talk) 09:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.