Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satsui no Hadou (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  delete. Wizardman 03:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Satsui no Hadou
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Written in a in-universe stile, fails WP:NOT. Most of the info in this article is from Japanese books and not from the games, which makes it pretty much impossible to rewrite this article in a real world perspective. I've read the comments in the previous AfD and noticed that most users "voting" for keep gave some pretty poor excuses for their "keeps" (or not saying why). Please don't do that. This article has content that is not suitable for an encyclopedia - Master Bigode from SRK.o// (Talk) (Contribs) 22:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete per my vote in the last AfD (as Danny Lilithborne). JuJube (talk) 22:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge Into one of the Street Fighter articles otherwise delete.--Sin Harvest (talk) 01:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete pretty crufty. I'm not optimistic that you could find a reference that demonstrates that this is notable in the real world.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC).
 * Merge I an inclusionist, but I have to admit this article could be written less in-universe and be sourced. If Japanese books are the source of this information, they should be noted.  I am open to changing my vote if some sources were found.  Ursasapien (talk) 01:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 02:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge This is hopelessly in-universe in style and lacks any refs to show notability. Edison (talk) 17:56, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no reliable sources. Blast Ulna (talk) 05:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.